Transparent QA across 100% of conversations

Agents see their own score, contest what's unfair, and grow through coaching. Supervisors stop sampling and ditch the spreadsheet — appeals and metrics live in one system.

0 %

Of conversations scored — not a 3–10% sample

×0

Faster than a supervisor's manual sampling

up to 0 %

Of routine QA lifted off the supervisor's team

0 %

Of score and coaching changes in the audit log

When
sampled QA misses problems

100% of conversations scored
Estimate the savings
01 — 05

When sampled QA misses the problems

A supervisor manages to listen to 3–5% of conversations — the real problems hide in the other 95%. Lia Sense scores every conversation against a checklist, and Coach surfaces the ones that failed (pass/fail/gate-fail) into a single queue.

02 — 05

When an agent doesn't understand the score

The agent sees their conversations, average score, and weekly trend. Each conversation comes with a checklist breakdown: what passed, what didn't, with quotes from the conversation. No more «because the supervisor said so».

03 — 05

When an agent thinks the score is unfair

The agent files an appeal on a specific metric. Workflow: pending → in review → accepted/rejected. The supervisor revises the score or explains the decision. The acceptRate metric shows how fair QA is on average.

04 — 05

When coaching is scattered across spreadsheets and chats

The supervisor writes coaching comments in the context of a specific conversation. History accumulates per agent — weekly progress is visible. No more feedback lost in WhatsApp chats.

05 — 05

When an agent's growth isn't visible

A weekly average-score chart, a breakdown by checklist, acceptRate dynamics. You see at a glance: who's growing, who's stuck, who needs a personal plan. For company-wide slices, data flows into Lia BI.

Estimate the savings

Also: appeal types tuned to your processes, an audit of score changes across the full period, export of coaching history per agent. Full list — on the demo.

Coach — the operational layer on top of Lia Sense

Sense listens to channels and scores conversations against checklists. Coach gives that scoring a human interface.

Lia Sense

Listens and scores

Transcription, NLU, checklists (pipeline). Every conversation gets an aggregate score and a per-metric breakdown.

Lia Coach

Working with the team

Agent room, appeals, coaching comments, trends. Supervisor and agent work in a shared interface.

Lia BI

The management view

The same data in BI dashboards for leadership: teams, channels, topics, trends, comparisons.

Estimate the Net ROI from speech analytics

from ₽2.5 per dialogue

Expected annual Net ROI

What industry are you in?

Pick a department

Who Lia Coach fits

Real project details are under NDA. Below is a composite profile of the team where Coach delivers the most.

Profile
A contact center of 20+ agents, text and voice support. Several channels (chat, phone, messengers). A manual sampled-QA process already in place.
What the first pilot closed
Connected Sense to the channels, set up 3–5 checklists for the core scenarios (greeting, answer accuracy, script adherence). Launched agent rooms and the appeals queue.
Result
Scoring on 100% of conversations instead of 3–5%. The supervisor works from a queue of failed conversations, not a random sample. Agents see their scores and can contest them.
Timeline
Connecting Sense — 1 week. Setting up checklists and launching the pilot team — up to 4 weeks. Full rollout across the contact center — up to 8 weeks.

What we deliberately don't do

We don't surveil the agent

Lia scores conversations against a business checklist: greeting phrasing, answer accuracy, script adherence. It doesn't track break length, app activity, or mouse movement.

We don't use emotions against the worker

Tone analysis shows the conversation context (e.g. an irritated customer — the agent is scored on their reaction, not on the fact that the customer was annoyed). We don't flag an employee as «emotionally unstable».

We don't override the agent with an algorithm

Coach is a growth tool, not a replacement. The final appeal decision belongs to the supervisor, not the algorithm. The algorithm proposes a score; a human decides.

We don't show personal data to colleagues

An agent sees their own room; a supervisor sees their team. No one sees others' appeals, coaching messages, or score-change history.

Pilot rollout plan

01 — 03

Connecting Lia Sense to the channels

We set up the data source. If Sense is already connected in your contact center, this step drops. From you: access to telephony or chat channels and a test sample of conversations for calibration.

02 — 03

Setting up checklists for your processes

We build a pipeline for each channel and scenario: greeting, needs discovery, answer accuracy, closing. From 3 to 10 metrics per checklist. We agree on weights and the pass threshold.

03 — 03

Team launch and training

We open rooms for agents and the appeals queue for supervisors. One hour of training per role, ready-made onboarding material. From you: a list of agents and supervisors, and the pilot team.

We'll launch Coach on a pilot team in 8 weeks

How is this different from a supervisor's usual QA sample?
A supervisor listens to 3–10% of conversations at random. Coach scores every conversation against a checklist via Lia Sense and queues only the ones that failed. The supervisor works with problems, not a random sample.
What gets scored — voice calls, or chats too?
Both channels. Lia Sense transcribes calls and reads chats, running both through the same checklist. On the Coach side the difference is invisible: a conversation is a conversation, a score is a score.
Who decides an appeal — the algorithm or a human?
A human. Coach shows the supervisor the context: original score, the agent's appeal, the proposed score. The accept/reject decision and the final score are set by the supervisor. The algorithm only proposes.
What data does an agent see? Can they see others'?
An agent sees only their own conversations, scores, appeals, and coaching. There's no list of colleagues or their scores. The team is visible to the supervisor; contact-center aggregates live in Lia BI for the manager.
Can Coach be connected on its own, without Lia Sense?
No. Coach runs on the scoring data that Sense produces. If you already have Sense, Coach plugs in on top. If not, we connect both modules in one pilot.

We'll show Coach on your conversations

30 minutes with a Lia specialist. We'll take a sample of your calls or chats, run them through a test checklist, and show the agent room and appeals interface.